CHIDESTER v. CITY OF HOBART

No. 45S03-9307-CV-797.

631 N.E.2d 908 (1994)

Jeffrey L. CHIDESTER, et al., Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. CITY OF HOBART, Indiana, Appellee (Defendant below).

Supreme Court of Indiana.

March 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Mayer, Gregory J. Tonner, Merrillville, for appellant.

James Greco, Merrillville, Debra Lynch Dubovich, Highland, for appellee.


SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Jeffrey Chidester challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the Lake Superior Court's conclusion that the City of Hobart's fiscal plan for annexing part of Ross Township was adequate. We hold that the plan and evidence are sufficient to sustain the annexation and affirm the trial court.

I. Facts and Case History

This case is here for the second time. On the first appeal, we noted that "[t]he trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases