1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 885 P.2d
  5. 885 P.2d 642 (1994)
 

SHARTS v. NATELSON

No. 21404.

885 P.2d 642 (1994)

118 N.M. 721

Wallace G. SHARTS and Stakeout Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Stephen NATELSON and Natelson & Ross, Defendants-Petitioners.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

October 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Joseph J. Mullins and Charles K. Purcell, Albuquerque, for petitioners.

Bosson & Canepa, P.A., Richard C. Bosson, Santa Fe, for respondents.

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

The issue in this case, as framed by our Court of Appeals in one of its opinions below, Sharts v. Natelson, 118 N.M. 330, 881 P.2d 690 (Ct.App.1993), is: "[W]hen may a trial court rule, as a matter of law, that harm or loss in fact exists sufficient for a cause of action in legal malpractice to accrue and begin the running of the four year limitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases