UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP. v. PACIFIC INV. CO.

Docket No. B070891.

30 Cal.App.4th 122 (1994)

35 Cal. Rptr.2d 382

UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Cross-complainant and Appellant, v. PACIFIC INVESTMENT COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

November 17, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Stephen M. Harris and Yu-Feng Frances Chou for Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Norby & Brodeur, Paul D. Loreto and Kim Anderson for Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

VOGEL (C.S.), J.

This action upon an indemnity contract was tried by the court upon agreed facts. The court found that appellant United States Elevator Corporation (Elevator) is not entitled to indemnity from respondent Pacific Investment Company (Pacific) for Elevator's costs of defending a third party lawsuit. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

Pacific owned a building in Pacific Palisades. Pacific contracted with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases