1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 871 S.W.2d
  5. 871 S.W.2d 632 (1994)
 

ROLLS v. ERNST & YOUNG

No. 62814.

871 S.W.2d 632 (1994)

John ROLLS, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ERNST & YOUNG, Defendant/Appellant.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Thomas Archer, St. Louis, and Melanie T. Morris, Washington, DC, for defendant, appellant.

Brinker, Doyen & Kovacs, P.C., Paul E. Kovacs and Dean R. Gallego, Clayton, for plaintiff, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

John Rolls, a client of Arthur Young, now defendant Ernst & Young, (Accountants) sued his accountants seeking actual and consequential damages based on inaccurate tax advice. The court entered a judgment in accord with a jury verdict for actual and consequential damages in the amount of $310,000. We find Accountants' two claims of error were not preserved and are without merit. We affirm.

In reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases