1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 885 S.W.2d
  5. 885 S.W.2d 603 (1994)
 

MINNESOTA MIN. & MFG. CO. v. NISHIKA LTD.

No. 09-93-126 CV.

885 S.W.2d 603 (1994)

MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. NISHIKA LTD., Lentec Corporation, American 3D Ltd., and Nishika Manufacturing (H.K.) Ltd., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Decided October 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret C. Ling, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, Carl A. Parker, Port Arthur, Russell J. Weintraub, Austin, Tom Alexander, Alexander & McEvily, Houston, Gilbert I. Low, Orgain, Bell & Tucker, Beaumont, Harry M. Reasoner, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, for appellant.

James B. Sales, Fulbright & Jaworski, Stephen D. Susman, Susman Godfrey, Houston, Walter Umphrey, Provost & Umphrey, Beaumont, for appellees.

Before WALKER, C.J., and BROOKSHIRE and BURGESS, JJ.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

On Motion for Rehearing the Court withdraws its opinion filed June 30, 1994, and its concurring and dissenting opinion filed August 4, 1994, and this opinion is substituted therefor.

Appeal from a jury verdict adverse to Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company ("3M"). The jury found that 3M had breached expressed warranties and implied warranties. The litigation arose pursuant to 3M's sale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases