1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 18 F.3d
  5. 18 F.3d 1443 (1994)
 

STEVENS v. MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC.

No. 92-55936.

18 F.3d 1443 (1994)

Leon STEVENS; Jerry Carson; Nick Cotogno; Ralph Allen; Lauro Andrade, Jr.; Betty Armet; Dale Ball, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOORE BUSINESS FORMS, INC., d/b/a Moore Business Forms & Systems Division; Local 404 M Graphic Communications International Union; Norman V. Salaets; Ray F. Ardanaz; Graham J. McClean, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale M. Fiola, Anaheim, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

William S. Waldo, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Howard Z. Rosen, Posner & Rosen, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: ALDISERT, HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges.

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal by union members from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of their union and their employer requires us to examine the statutory duty of fair representation and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. We must determine whether the district court properly concluded that the Appellants failed to present sufficient evidence that the union breached its statutory duty of fair representation. This is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases