1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 870 F.Supp.
  5. 870 F.Supp. 589 (1994)
 

PIEZO CRYSTAL CO. v. UDDEHOLM CORP.

Civ. No. 91-0938.

870 F.Supp. 589 (1994)

PIEZO CRYSTAL COMPANY, a division of PPA Industries, Inc., Plaintiff v. The UDDEHOLM CORPORATION, Uddeholms, A.B., Uddeholm Strip Steel, A.B. and Randall Yates, an individual, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania, Scranton Division.

August 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Stephen Shibla, Rhoads & Sinon, Harrisburg, PA, for plaintiff.

Martha M. Mannix, Rebecca McClincy-Darr, Arnold Friedman and Edward Friedman, Friedman & Friedman, Pittsburgh, PA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

In its amended complaint, filed on February 10, 1992 (Dkt. Entry # 15), Piezo Crystal Company (hereafter "Piezo") asserted contract and fraud claims in relation to its purchase of steel for use in its production of precision timing devices. Jurisdiction exists based upon diversity of citizenship.

On October 7, 1993, defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims asserted in the amended complaint. For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases