1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 863 F.Supp.
  5. 863 F.Supp. 592 (1994)
 

STUMPF v. CINCINNATI, INC.

No. C-1-93-250.

863 F.Supp. 592 (1994)

Alban V. STUMPF, Plaintiff, v. CINCINNATI, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

September 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randolph Harry Freking, Freking & Betz, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff.

Charles Matthew Roesch, Dinsmore & Shohl, Cincinnati, OH, for defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE

SPIEGEL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 24), Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 28), Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 30), Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases