HINKLEY v. SAFEPRO, INC.

No. 91-CV-1292.

853 F.Supp. 594 (1994)

William and Louise HINKLEY, Plaintiffs, v. SAFEPRO, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

June 2, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orseck, Orseck Law Firm (Gerald Orseck, of counsel), Liberty, NY, for plaintiffs.

Calinoff, Katz Law Firm (Arnold I. Katz, of counsel), New York City, for defendant Safepro.


MEMORANDUM—DECISION—ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

Currently before the court is a motion by Safepro Inc. (hereinafter "Safepro") for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. With due regard given to the submissions of the parties, and after concluding that oral arguments would not facilitate disposition of this matter, the court finds that summary judgment should be granted in favor of the defendant.

1. Discussion

The current...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases