1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 519 N.W.2d
  5. 519 N.W.2d 911 (1994)
 

PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRR., INC. v. TORO

No. C6-94-109.

519 N.W.2d 911 (1994)

PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRRIGATION, INC., Appellant, v. The TORO COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. DeMay, Jerry S. Podkopacz, David R. Crosby, Leonard, Street & Deinard, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Alan I. Silver, James R. Crassweller, Steven G. Mahon, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., HUSPENI and AMUNDSON, JJ.

Review Denied (2 Pets.) September 16, 1994.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. (Pacific) was a distributor of products for respondent, The Toro Company (Toro). When Toro decided to terminate Pacific's distributorship, Pacific sought injunctive relief to prevent Toro from doing so. Pacific argues that the district court erred in denying its temporary injunction motion. Because we conclude that the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases