1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 512 N.W.2d
  5. 512 N.W.2d 907 (1994)
 

MUELLER v. THEIS

Nos. C1-93-1576, CX-93-1690.

512 N.W.2d 907 (1994)

David MUELLER, et al., Respondents (C1-93-1576), Appellants (CX-93-1690), and Farmers Insurance Group, intervening plaintiff, Appellant (C1-93-1576), Respondent (CX-93-1690), v. James THEIS, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul K. Downes, Pritzker & Meyer, P.A., Minneapolis, for David Mueller, et al., respondents (C1-93-1576), appellants (CX-93-1690).

Erik J. Askegaard and Christopher D. Robinson, Askegaard Law Office, Brainerd, for Farmers Ins. Group, intervening plaintiff, appellant (C1-93-1576), respondent (CX-93-1690).

Frank J. Rajkowski and Molly J. Wingate, Donohue Rajkowski, Ltd., St. Cloud, for James Theis, et al., respondents.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, P.J., and KLAPHAKE and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, appellants David and Kenneth Mueller challenge summary judgment, contending the district court erred in dismissing their absolute liability claim under Minn.Stat. § 347.22 (1992) (dog owner's liability) for insufficient causation. Appellant Farmers Insurance Group challenges the dismissal of its reimbursement and subrogation claims against the Muellers and respondents James and Curtis Theis. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases