1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 867 P.2d
  5. 867 P.2d 535 (1994)
 

LANGFORD v. CITY OF EUGENE

LUBA No. 93-090; CA A81712.

867 P.2d 535 (1994)

126 Or. App. 52

Eric LANGFORD, Ty Huling and Milo Dudden, Respondents, v. CITY OF EUGENE and Lane County Housing Authority and Community Services Agency, Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn Klein argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Stephen L. Vorhes, and Harrang Long Watkinson Laird & Rubenstein, P.C.

Douglas M. DuPriest argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Parrish & Coons, P.C.

Before DEITS, P.J., RIGGS, J., and DURHAM, J. Pro tem.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

The City of Eugene (city) and Lane County Housing Authority and Community Services Agency (HACSA) seek review of LUBA's decision remanding the city's approval of HACSA's application for a conditional use permit to construct a "controlled income and rent" (CIR) low income housing project.1 LUBA concluded that the city erred in three respects: its findings relating to the adequacy of the emergency response

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases