O'NEAL v. DESCHUTES COUNTY

LUBA No. 93-096; CA A81813.

867 P.2d 532 (1994)

126 Or. App. 47

Ron O'NEAL and Vicki O'Neal, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Respondent, and Sun Village Realty, Inc., Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 19, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg Hendrix argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Hendrix & Chappell.

Martin E. Hansen argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Karnopp, Petersen, Noteboom, Hubel, Hansen & Arnett.

No appearance for respondent Deschutes County.

Before DEITS, P.J., RIGGS, J., and DURHAM, J. Pro Tem.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of and respondent Sun Village Realty, Inc. (Sun Village) cross-petitions from LUBA's decision remanding Deschutes County's approval of Sun Village's application to construct a structure to house various commercial operations. Petitioners make two assignments, both of which we reject without discussion.

Sun Village's cross-petition challenges LUBA's remand of the county's decision for a more adequate explanation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases