1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 863 F.Supp.
  5. 863 F.Supp. 535 (1994)
 

SPRINGSTON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

No. 3:93 CV 7233.

863 F.Supp. 535 (1994)

Robert S. SPRINGSTON, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

July 5, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Douglas Liber, Dennis R. Lansdowne, Spangenberg, Shibley, Traci, Lancione & Liber, Cleveland, OH, Ralph E. Jocke, Patricia Ann Walker, Walker & Jocke, Medina, OH, for plaintiff.

Richard S. Milligan, Philip E. Howes, Thomas R. Himmelspach, Robert B. Daane, Vogelgesang, Howes, Lindamood & Brunn, Canton, OH, for Consolidated Rail Corp.

Thomas J. Sweeney, Pietragallo, Bosick & Gordon, Pittsburgh, PA, for General Motors Corp.

David J. Hanna, Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, OH, for David J. Hanna.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the motion of defendant General Motors Corporation, Electro-Motive Division ("General Motors") summary judgment, and the motion of defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff opposes both motions, and both Conrail and General Motors have filed reply briefs. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases