TATE v. DERIFIELD

No. 93-351.

510 N.W.2d 885 (1994)

Denise TATE, Appellant, v. Roxanne DERIFIELD and the Tri-County Drug Task Force, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

Rehearing Denied February 21, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C.A. Frerichs and Thomas P. Frerichs, Waterloo, for appellant.

James E. Walsh, Jr. and Nathan A. Callahan of Clark, Butler, Walsh & McGivern, Waterloo, for appellees.

Considered by LARSON, P.J., and LAVORATO, SNELL, ANDREASEN, and TERNUS, JJ.


ANDREASEN, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the district court's dismissal of her action for damages for loss of spousal consortium. The district court dismissed plaintiff's action ruling that loss of consortium was a derivative claim and could not be brought absent an action by the injured spouse. For reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm.

I. Background.

Denise Tate (Tate) filed a petition seeking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases