LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP. v. ASARCO INC.

Nos. 92-35061, 92-35144, 92-35145, 92-35148, 92-35149 and 92-35152.

13 F.3d 1378 (1994)

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; Port of Tacoma, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. v. William FJETLAND; B & L Trucking and Construction Co., Inc.; Industrial Mineral Products, Inc.; Murray Pacific Corporation; Portac, Inc.; Cascade Timber Company; Executive Bark Inc.; Wasser & Winters Company; Eagle Trucking, Inc., Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CASCADE TIMBER COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, William Fjetland; B & L Trucking and Construction Co., Inc.; Industrial Mineral Products, Inc.; Murray Pacific Corporation; Portac, Inc., Third-Party Defendants. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; Port of Tacoma, Plaintiffs, Portac, INC., Third-Party Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, William Fjetland, et al., Third-Party Defendants. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; Plaintiff, v. MURRAY PACIFIC CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, William Fjetland; B & L Trucking and Construction Co., Inc.; Industrial Mineral Products, Inc., Third-Party Defendants. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; Port of Tacoma, Plaintiffs, Wasser & Winters Company, Third-Party Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee, William Fjetland, et al., Third-Party Defendants. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and Port of Tacoma, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 13, 1994.


ORDER

The opinion filed September 23, 1993, and published at 6 F.3d 1332 (9th Cir.1993), is amended as follows:

1. At page 1335, the last paragraph on the page which begins "We have jurisdiction under" is amended by deleting the fourth sentence of that paragraph (which sentence begins "Because the remaining WPLA damages") and inserting in its place the sentence: "We remand to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases