HOECHST CELANESE CORP. v. BP CHEMICALS LTD.

Civ. A. No. G-93-001.

846 F.Supp. 542 (1994)

HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION v. BP CHEMICALS LIMITED and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division.

March 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Lynch, Michael Macklin, Arnold White & Durkee, Houston, TX, for plaintiff.

John Christopher Reynolds, Robin C. Gibbs, Gibbs & Ratliff, Houston, TX, Harold Haidt, G. Thomas Delahunty, Brooks Haidt Haffner & Delahunty, New York City, Jack C. Berenzweig, Willian Brinks & Olds, Chicago, IL, for defendants.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER ON POST-VERDICT MOTIONS

KENT, District Judge.

This action came to trial on January 10, 1994, before the Court and a jury. The jury returned a verdict, finding that Defendants BP Chemicals and Sterling Chemicals had infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,615,806 (the '806 patent), owned by Plaintiff Celanese; that such infringement was willful; that the '806 patent was not obvious; that the application for the ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases