1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 876 S.W.2d
  5. 876 S.W.2d 509 (1994)
 

BANOWSKY v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 07-93-0373-CV.

876 S.W.2d 509 (1994)

Baxter W. BANOWSKY, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo.

April 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Figari & Davenport, Baxter W. Banowsky, Dallas, for appellant.

Gwinn & Roby, Gary D. Lykins and G. Bryan McDonald, Dallas, for appellee.

Before REYNOLDS, C.J., and BOYD and POFF, JJ.

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Aggrieved by a take-nothing summary judgment rendered in his action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Baxter W. Banowsky contends, by four points of error, that State Farm did not establish its right to summary judgment. By cross-point, State Farm maintains that Banowsky did not establish his right to the take-nothing summary judgment rendered on its counterclaim. Based upon the rationale expressed, we will affirm in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases