1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 18 F.3d
  5. 18 F.3d 1362 (1994)
 

JOHNSON v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO.

Nos. 93-1628, 93-1661.

18 F.3d 1362 (1994)

Ray A. JOHNSON and R.J. Industries, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants, v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Russell HITCHCOCK, Third-Party Defendant-Counterclaimant, and Hitchcock International, Limited and Robert C. Hitchcock Company, Incorporated, Third-Party Plaintiffs. Appeal of Paul A. PIASKOSKI, Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Piaskoski, Anthony A. Coletti, Piaskoski & Associates, Milwaukee, WI, for Ray Johnson and R.J. Industries, Inc.

Paul A. Piaskoski, Piaskoski & Associates, Milwaukee, WI, for Hitchcock Intern., Ltd., Robert C. Hitchcock Co., Inc. and Russell Hitchcock.

Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., James L. Huston (argued), Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, for A.W. Chesterton Co.

W. Stuart Parsons (argued), Quarles & Brady, Anthony A. Coletti, Paul A. Piaskoski, Piaskoski & Associates, Milwaukee, WI, for Paul A. Piaskoski.

Before COFFEY and MANION, Circuit Judges, and SKINNER, District Judge.

SKINNER, District Judge.

These are cross appeals from the imposition of a sanction against Paul A. Piaskoski ("Piaskoski"), attorney for the Johnson and Hitchcock interests, in favor of A.W. Chesterton Company ("the defendant"), under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. Piaskoski asserts that it was error to impose the sanction. The defendant counters that it was an abuse of discretion for the district judge to impose only 20% of the attorney's fees incurred by it in defense of allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases