1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 103 Md.
  5. 103 Md. App. 34 (1994)
 

BARTHOLOMEE v. CASEY

No. 39, September Term, 1994.

103 Md. App. 34 (1994)

WAYNE BARTHOLOMEE, ET AL. v. TINA CASEY, ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Reconsideration Denied February 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Church (Francis V. Kenneally and Church & Houff, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant Bartholomee.

Howard J. Schulman, Baltimore, for appellant Grossman.

Scott E. Nevin (Saul E. Kerpelman, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellees.

Argued before BISHOP, FISCHER and HOLLANDER, JJ.

HOLLANDER, Judge.

In this lead paint case, appellants, Wayne Bartholomee and the personal representative of the estate of Vivian Grossman, appeal from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in favor of appellees, Tina Casey, a minor, and Michelle Robinson McDaniel, her mother and next friend. Appellees claim that Casey suffered lead poisoning from her exposure to lead-based paint at one or more residences, and that appellants, who were owners/landlords...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases