1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 880 P.2d
  5. 880 P.2d 486 (1994)
 

BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY v. MEDFORD

LUBA 92-172, 92-192; CA A84711.

880 P.2d 486 (1994)

130 Or. App. 24

BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MEDFORD, Respondent. BEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 7, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee A. Mills, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Brophy, Mills, Schmor, Gerking & Brophy.

Eugene F. Hart, Jr., Medford, attorney for respondent City of Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Arminda J. Brown, attorney for respondent Jackson County.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (petitioner) is a district established under ORS chapter 450, which provides sewer services to property located in urbanizable unincorporated areas that are inside the city of Medford's urban growth boundary. In 1992, the city and Jackson County adopted identical urbanization policies as part of their acknowledged comprehensive plans.1 The policies provide, as relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases