CINCINNATI INS. v. HOPKINS SPORTING GOODS

No. 93-995.

522 N.W.2d 837 (1994)

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HOPKINS SPORTING GOODS, INC., Appellee.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

October 19, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L.W. Rosebrook and Steven L. Serck of Ahlers, Cooney, Dorweiler, Haynie, Smith & Allbee, P.C., Des Moines, for appellant.

John A. McClintock and John E. Swanson of Hansen, McClintock & Riley, Des Moines, for appellee.

Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and LARSON, CARTER, SNELL, and ANDREASEN, JJ.


HARRIS, Justice.

This is a dispute over the amount of insurance coverage provided in an insurance policy's dishonest employee endorsement. One issue is whether the policy covered a loss incurred during the period of a prior policy, but discovered during a later one. Another issue is whether the policy provided separate $15,000 protections for each of the three years of the policy, or was limited to a total of $15,000 for the entire three-year period. A third issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases