ATTERBURY v. WELLS

92CV1575CC; CA A78184.

866 P.2d 484 (1994)

125 Or. App. 591

Carolyn L. ATTERBURY, Appellant, v. Rulon WELLS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 5, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Stebbins argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Stebbins & Coffey.

George A. Burgott argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Atherly, Butler & Burgott.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, based on the trial court's holding that defendant was not adequately served with summons and complaint. We affirm.

On July 5, 1990, plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. On June 30, 1992, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that her injuries were the result of defendant's negligence. The facts relating to service of summons are undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases