1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 634 N.E.2d
  5. 634 N.E.2d 707 (1994)
 

SOHAEY v. VAN CURA

No. 75212.

634 N.E.2d 707 (1994)

158 Ill.2d 375

199 Ill.Dec. 654

Manutchehr SOHAEY et al., Appellees, v. Mark X. VAN CURA et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Kincaid, Mirabella & Kincaid, P.C., Wheaton, James A Hockman, Rosemont, for appellants.

James W. Naisbitt and Stephan A Glickman, Chuhak & Tecson, P.C., Chicago, for appellees.

Justice HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court:

Resolution of this case requires this court to determine (1) whether trial courts have discretion in fashioning a sanction for a technical violation of Rule 220, and (2) whether defendants can be considered prevailing parties under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1991, ch. 121½ par. 261 et seq.) and thereby receive attorney fees.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases