AGOSTINO FERRARI, S.p.A. v. ANTONACCI

Civ. A. No. 93-1809.

858 F.Supp. 478 (1994)

AGOSTINO FERRARI, S.p.A., Plaintiff, v. Carmen ANTONACCI, Ferrari Intech Corp., and RTA Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 26, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Groshens, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews and Ingersoll, Mark A. Nation, J. Shane Creamer, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Kauffman, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Thomas C. Zielinski, Cozen & O'Connor, Joseph P. Fenlin, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.


ORDER-MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 1994, upon consideration of the plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint (Doc. No. 23), the defendants' response thereto and motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 24), and the plaintiff's motion for continuance (Doc. No. 25), and after a final pretrial conference in this matter, it appearing that the Court is without subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases