1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 630 So.2d
  5. 630 So.2d 682 (1994)
 

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. LANMAN

No. 93-1634.

630 So.2d 682 (1994)

GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Andrea P. LANMAN, Albert T. Tyler, Jr., Isuzu Motors of America, a Foreign Corporation, and Tom Endicott Buick, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Montefusco of Moody & Jones, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Nathan D. Clark of Law Offices of Nathan D. Clark, Miami, for appellees — Andrea P. Lanman & Albert T. Eyler, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. As "good cause" for why plaintiffs/appellees failed to serve a defendant within the 120-day rule, see Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(i), appellees stated that prior counsel was attempting settlement with another codefendant. That does not constitute "good cause" for failing to serve a codefendant. Cf. Hernandez v. Page, 580 So.2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Further, appellees' counsel's subsequent difficulties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases