RIFKIND & STERLING, INC. v. RIFKIND

Docket No. B074042.

28 Cal.App.4th 1282 (1994)

33 Cal. Rptr.2d 828

RIFKIND & STERLING, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

September 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert & Matz, Joel E. Boxer, Thomas R. Freeman, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Thomas Henry Coleman for Defendant and Appellant.

Phillip Schlosberg for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

FUKUTO, J.

Concern about potential for arbitrariness in punitive damage awards by juries has recently led to recognition of certain constitutional, due process limitations on the imposition of such awards. In this case, the appellant contends that one of those limitations, the requirement of judicial review, must apply to a punitive damage award assessed not by a court or a jury, but by a private arbitrator, under a voluntary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases