BOLES v. CITY OF CHATTANOOGA


892 S.W.2d 416 (1994)

David Bernard BOLES, Sara Boles and David Lamar Franklin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied October 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Haines Rotroff, Chattanooga, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Randall L. Nelson, City Atty., Wm. Shelley Parker, Jr. and Phillip A. Noblett, Chattanooga, for defendant-appellant.


Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court October 24, 1994.

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action involving zoning issues. The Defendant City of Chattanooga appeals the Judgment of the trial court permitting the Plaintiffs to continue the "non-conforming" use of their property as the site of an "adult-oriented establishment." The Chancellor, sitting without a jury, found that the failure of the Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases