McCURRY v. KEITH

No. 2114.

439 S.E.2d 861 (1994)

Jane Davenport McCURRY, Appellant, v. Dennie W. KEITH and Cynthia S. Keith d/b/a The Executive and/or Dennie W. Keith Amusements, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided January 10, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. McDow, Rock Hill, for appellant.

Stanley D. Ragsdale, of Leventis & Ragsdale; and F. Patrick Hubbard; Columbia, for respondents.


CONNOR, Judge.

Jane Davenport McCurry sued the Keiths to recover over $8,000 she lost playing video poker machines at their business. She alleged fifteen separate incidents. The trial judge granted the Keiths' motion for judgment on the pleadings and McCurry appeals. We reverse and remand.

The court held the facts McCurry alleged showed: (1) the money she lost was for the use of the machine; (2) the poker machines were not illegal and, therefore, not in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases