HEIN v. TechAMERICA GROUP, INC.

Nos. 92-3337, 92-3378.

17 F.3d 1278 (1994)

Virgil David HEIN, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. TechAMERICA GROUP, INC., and Fermenta Animal Health Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

February 23, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian D. Williams (John G. Early with him on the briefs) of Watson, Ess, Marshall & Enggas, Kansas City, Missouri, for Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

Thomas L. Thurston (Thomas A. Hamill with him on the brief) of Perry & Hamill, Overland Park, Kansas, for Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

Before BALDOCK, McWILLIAMS and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.


BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal and cross-appeal each requires resolution of a single issue. On appeal, the issue is whether an employee's interest in an employer's salary continuation plan vested. The trial court concluded it was not and we affirm. On cross-appeal, the issue is whether the employer is entitled to recover benefits and salary paid the employee under the faithless servant doctrine. The trial court concluded it was not and we affirm.

A

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases