PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. Because appellant's offenses occurred during a single criminal episode, consecutive minimum mandatory sentences were improper. Daniels v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.