HOOGASIAN FLOWERS, INC. v. ST. BD. OF EQUALIZATION

Docket No. C016105.

23 Cal.App.4th 1264 (1994)

28 Cal. Rptr.2d 686

HOOGASIAN FLOWERS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant and Appellant; SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATIONAL FINANCING AUTHORITY, Interevener and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Lawrence K. Keethe and Robert D. Milam, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, David B. Goodwin, Celia M. Jackson and Jeffrey S. Sloan for Intervener and Appellant.

Jonathan M. Coupal and Trevor A. Grimm for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

SIMS, J.

In this action by retailers for a refund of a local sales tax, defendant State Board of Equalization (SBE) and intervener San Francisco Educational Financing Authority (EFA) appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Hoogasian Flowers, Inc., Ace Pharmacy, Diane O., and Surf Pharmacy (the retailers). The sales tax at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases