TENOLD v. WEYERHAEUSER CO.

89-2198 CV; CA A72816.

873 P.2d 413 (1994)

127 Or. App. 511

Thomas TENOLD, Respondent, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, a corporation, and Larry Hoff, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted November 3, 1993.

Decided April 20, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Weyerhaeuser Co. Alan M. Scott argued the cause for appellant Larry Hoff. With them on the briefs were James H. Clarke and Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky, and Galton, Scott & Colett.

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.


Resubmitted In Banc November 3, 1993.

DURHAM, Judge Pro Tem.

Defendants appeal a jury verdict entered against them for $2,552,566. They make multiple assignments of error. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed three claims against defendant Weyerhaeuser Company (Weyerhaeuser): malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and defamation. The jury found for plaintiff and awarded $900,000 noneconomic damages, $2,566 economic damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases