LANE v. SAIF CORPORATION

92-09931 and 92-08414; CA A80625.

887 P.2d 393 (1994)

132 Or. App. 371

In the Matter of the Complying Status of Dan J. and Giselle Dana Lane, and In the Matter of the Compensation of Marshall K. Birdwell, Claimant. Dan J. LANE and Giselle Dana Lane, Petitioners, v. SAIF CORPORATION, Department of Insurance and Finance and Marshall K. Birdwell, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth L. Kleinsmith, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Mildred J. Carmack, William H. Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondents SAIF Corp. and Dept. of Ins. and Finance. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

No appearance for respondent Marshall K. Birdwell.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this workers' compensation case, the Board determined that petitioners were noncomplying employers and upheld SAIF's acceptance of claimant's head and back injury on behalf of petitioners. The Board did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court's opinion in S-W Floor Cover Shop v. NCCI, 318 Or. 614, 872 P.2d 1 (1994), when it issued its order.

SAIF concedes that the Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases