KENNEDY, INC. v. YOUNG

No. CX-94-1294.

524 N.W.2d 752 (1994)

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: KENNEDY, MATTHEWS, LANDIS, HEALY & PECORA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner (and Cross-Respondent), Appellant, v. Michael A. YOUNG, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 13, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Incorporated, pro se.

Mark J. Briol, Gregory L. Wilmes, Briol & Wilmes, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and JONES, JJ.


OPINION

JONES,* Judge.

Appellant Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Inc., challenges the district court's confirmation of an arbitration panel's award of punitive damages on the grounds the arbitration panel exceeded its powers. Appellant also asserts the district court improperly awarded postjudgment interest pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 334.01 (1981).

We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases