U.S. v. McFARLAND

No. 94-1264.

37 F.3d 1235 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy A. McFARLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 12, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victoria Ursulskis (argued), Office of U.S. Atty., Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff-appellee.

William E. Daily (argued), Danville, IN, for defendant-appellant.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, and GORDON, District Judge.


EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

As in most contemporary criminal appeals, the determination of the sentence takes center stage. Counsel broaches other subjects, but the jury was entitled to believe the prosecution's witnesses, and the due process clause of the fifth amendment does not entitle a criminal defendant to pretrial discovery after the model of the civil rules. Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 559, 97 S.Ct. 837, 845...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases