Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject the contention of defendant that his guilty plea to burglary in the second degree under superior court information No. 92-45 is deficient because he did not admit the specific crime he intended to commit when he knowingly entered the dwelling unlawfully. There is no requirement that the People allege or prove what particular crime was intended, or that the intended crime actually be committed (see
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.