1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 630 So.2d
  5. 630 So.2d 625 (1994)
 

HOBLEY v. METZ

No. 93-1748.

630 So.2d 625 (1994)

Liffort HOBLEY, et al., Appellants, v. Helmar METZ, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jorden, Burt, Berenson & Klingensmith and Melanie S. Cherdack, Miami, for appellants.

Bruce W. Parrish, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Liffort and Leisha Hobley from a non-final order granting the appellee Helmar Metz summary judgment on the issue of whether the appellee is a holder in due course of a promissory note. We reverse.

This Court has jurisdiction, under Rule 9.130(a)(3)(iv) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, to review this interlocutory order finding the appellee a holder in due course. The order did not reserve jurisdiction to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases