VAN HOUTEN v. PRITCHARD

No. 93-473.

870 S.W.2d 377 (1994)

315 Ark. 688

Peter VAN HOUTEN, Appellant, v. Rick PRITCHARD, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

February 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard N. Watts, Brian Allen Brown, Little Rock, for appellant.

Gregory S. Kitterman, Little Rock, for appellee.


DUDLEY, Justice.

The defendant, Peter Van Houten, had owned a cat for three years before it bit the plaintiff, Rick Pritchard. During that period it had never shown a disposition toward biting or being abnormally dangerous, and the defendant allowed it to run at large. On March 21, 1992, the cat entered plaintiff's garage and urinated, and, as plaintiff tried to take it outside, it bit plaintiff on his right index finger. As a direct result of the bite, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases