1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 645 So.2d
  5. 645 So.2d 599 (1994)
 

GONZALEZ v. STAR ENTERPRISES

No. 94-294.

645 So.2d 599 (1994)

Ismael GONZALEZ and Candida Gonzalez, his wife, Appellants, v. STAR ENTERPRISES, a general partnership created under New York General Partnership Laws between Texaco Refining & Marketing (East), Inc., and Saudi Refining, Inc., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 30, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maland & Ross and Lauri Waldman Ross, Simon & Nelson, Miami, for appellants.

Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Paul H. Field, Miami, for Star Enterprises appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court, believing that the trial testimony of one of the appellants was in direct conflict with that appellant's prior deposition testimony, granted the appellees' Motion for Directed Verdict,1 acting pursuant to the perceived authority of Williams v. Duggan, 172 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). Without addressing the possible applicability of Williams v. Duggan to this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases