HANCOCK v. BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC.

No. 93-CV-109.

645 A.2d 588 (1994)

James C. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. The BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC., Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Howard Simpson, Bethesda, MD, for appellant.

Susan F. Wiltsie, with whom A. Neal Barkus, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before SCHWELB and KING, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.


GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

On July 20, 1992, appellant brought suit against The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (BNA) (his former employer) for constructive discharge, alleging that he had been forced to retire due to BNA's discriminatory conduct toward him. Appellee BNA moved for summary judgment and appellant now appeals the trial court's grant of that motion.

The trial court concluded that the applicable one-year statute of limitations ("SOL") for appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases