Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Defendant appeals from a judgment, following a nonjury trial, convicting him of one count of murder in the second degree. We conclude that the pretrial photo array identification was not unduly suggestive. Even if the array were suggestive, there was a sufficient independent basis for the witness's in-court identification of defendant (see, People v Callace
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.