MOTTO v. MOTTO

No. 93-2390.

633 So.2d 575 (1994)

Lawrence MOTTO, Appellant, v. Patricia A. MOTTO, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward W. Staab, III, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Marietta Hamill and Elizabeth J. Bardfeld of Bacen & Kaplan, Fort Lauderdale, and Ruby Seymour-Barr, of Seymour-Barr Associates, Hollywood, for appellee.


FASTRACK

PER CURIAM.

On the record before this court, unchallenged by the appellee, the appellant has demonstrated a substantial change in circumstances that would ordinarily merit a reduction in his support obligations. For this reason we conclude the trial court erred in denying a modification.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court reconsider appellant's petition and grant some reduction commensurate with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases