1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 983 (1994)
 

CHAMBERLAIN, D'AMANDA, OPPENHEIMER & GREENFIELD v. BEAUCHAMP

209 A.D.2d 983 (1994)

619 N.Y.S.2d 451

Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, Respondent, v. Claude A. Beauchamp et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 16, 1994

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendants in accordance with the following Memorandum: As limited by their brief (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984), defendants challenge that part of an order and judgment that granted plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' answer and counterclaim and awarded plaintiff judgment on its complaint as a CPLR 3126 sanction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases