LEWIS v. BLAKE

No. 94-0097.

876 S.W.2d 314 (1994)

Craig LEWIS and Fisher, Gallagher, Perrin & Lewis, Petitioners, v. Gary BLAKE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Rehearing Overruled June 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Gerald Treece, Charles B. Holm, Charles L. Cotton, Houston, for petitioners.

James A. Gieseke, Houston, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This case presents two questions of summary judgment procedure. First: when a motion for summary judgment is served by mail, does Tex.R.Civ.P. 21a1 add three days to the 21-day notice period of the hearing prescribed by Rule 166a(c)? Second: does Rule 4 govern the computation of the notice period prescribed by Rule 166a(c)? We answer both questions "yes".

Gary Blake sued his lawyer, Craig Lewis, and the law firm of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases