Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that photographic arrays were unduly suggestive because defendant was the only person whose photograph appeared in both arrays. "Multiple photo identification procedures are not inherently suggestive" (People v Chapman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DANIELS
202 A.D.2d 987 (1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 984
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Burnie E. Daniels, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 11, 1994
March 11, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
