1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 201 A.D.2d
  5. 201 A.D.2d 985 (1994)
 

MATTER OF SETH v. SETH

201 A.D.2d 985 (1994)

610 N.Y.S.2d 894

In the Matter of Sudesh Seth, Respondent, v. Sham Sunder Seth, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 4, 1994

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Family Court erred in its determination that respondent's objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner were untimely. Section 439 (e) of the Family Court Act provides that respondent has 30 days from the entry of the order to file his objections. The running of that period commences with service of notice of entry upon the affected party (see, Matter of Canfield v Canfield,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases