Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting testimony by complainants that they considered the room from which their radio was stolen to be part of their "home". The room adjoined their apartment and was exclusively occupied and used by them as an "art room" and for the storage of personal belongings. The testimony of complainants was factual and did not constitute improper opinion (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.