U.S. v. NEAL

No. 93-5145.

27 F.3d 90 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kent NEAL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 13, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Clinton Wayne Smith, Charleston, WV, for appellant. John Kirk Brandfass, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charleston, WV, for appellee.

ON BRIEF: Michael W. Carey, U.S. Atty., Charleston, WV, for appellee.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and OSTEEN, United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.


Reversed and remanded by published per curiam opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This appeal apparently presents a question of first impression both for this Court and for the remaining federal circuits. The question formally presented is whether the trial judge erred in finding, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1 and 4B1.2(2) that the defendant, Kent Neal, was a career offender by virtue of having been convicted of two felony offenses under §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases