1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 22 F.3d
  5. 22 F.3d 1150 (1994)
 

ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS v. FLRA

No. 92-1379.

22 F.3d 1150 (1994)

ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS, MONTANA AIR CHAPTER NO. 29, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided May 6, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Schember, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

William R. Tobey, Deputy Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were David M. Smith, Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Arthur A. Horowitz and Frederick M. Herrera, Attorneys, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC.

Before WALD, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

WALD, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner, the Association of Civilian Technicians, Montana Air Chapter No. 29 ("Union") negotiated and executed a collective bargaining agreement ("Agreement") with the Montana National Guard ("Activity") permitting technicians to wear standard civilian attire in place of a uniform. When the Agreement was presented for review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases